Reviewer Guideline

Reviewer Guidelines for Essentials of Frontline Medicine Journal (EFMJ)

Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for Essentials of Frontline Medicine Journal (EFMJ). Your expertise and thoughtful evaluation are critical to maintaining the quality and integrity of our journal. The following guidelines are provided to assist you in conducting a thorough and constructive review.

1. Role and Responsibilities of Reviewers

  • Provide an objective, impartial, and confidential review of the manuscript.
  • Evaluate the manuscript's scientific rigor, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal's aims and scope.
  • Offer specific and actionable feedback to help authors improve their work.
  • Declare any conflicts of interest promptly to the editorial office.
  • Complete the review within the agreed-upon time-frame, typically 10 days.

2. Confidentiality

  • Manuscripts and associated materials are confidential and should not be shared or discussed with others without prior authorization from the journal’s editorial office.
  • Do not use any information obtained during the review process for personal or professional advantage.

3. Criteria for Evaluation

Original Research Articles:

  • Relevance: Does the manuscript align with the journal’s scope and address significant issues in Family Medicine or medicinal disciplines?
  • Originality: Does the study provide new insights or add to the existing body of knowledge?
  • Methodology: Are the study design, methods, and data analysis robust and appropriate?
  • Results: Are the results clearly presented and supported by the data?
  • Discussion: Does the discussion interpret the findings in context and address limitations?
  • References: Are references relevant, up-to-date, and correctly cited?

Review Articles:

  • Is the review comprehensive, balanced, and well-organized?
  • Does it critically appraise the literature and identify gaps for future research?

Case Reports:

  • Does the report highlight a novel or rare case with important clinical implications?
  • Is the discussion clear and educational for the journal’s audience?

Commentaries and Perspectives:

  • Are the arguments coherent, well-supported, and relevant to current issues in medicine?

4. Structuring Your Review

  1. Summary: Provide a brief overview of the manuscript, including its main findings and significance.
  2. Major Comments: Highlight key strengths and areas requiring significant improvement. Focus on:
    • Scientific rigor and validity.
    • Logical flow and coherence.
    • Gaps or inconsistencies in the data or arguments.
  3. Minor Comments: Note minor issues such as typos, unclear phrasing, or formatting errors.
  4. Recommendation: Choose one of the following:
    • Accept.
    • Minor Revision.
    • Major Revision.
    • Reject (with clear justification).

5. Ethical Considerations

  • Report any ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unethical study practices.
  • Ensure that the manuscript adheres to relevant ethical guidelines (e.g., Declaration of Helsinki, CONSORT for randomized trials).

6. Submitting Your Review

  • Log in to the online submission system at [reviewer portal link].
  • Provide your review comments and recommendation in the designated fields.
  • Upload annotated versions of the manuscript if necessary, ensuring comments are constructive and professional.

7. Recognition for Reviewers

Essentials of Frontline Medicine Journal (EFMJ) values your contribution and offers the following to recognize your efforts:

  • Acknowledgment in the journal’s annual list of reviewers.
  • A certificate of appreciation upon request.
  • Opportunities for continued collaboration with the journal’s editorial team.

8. Contact Information

For questions or assistance, please contact the editorial office:

Thank you for your commitment to upholding the standards of Essentials of Frontline Medicine Journal (EFMJ). Your expertise and dedication are vital to our mission of advancing knowledge in Medicine and beyond.